I think most schools follow the
philosophy of realism, accepting that reality exists with or without us and we
can observe it. Schools organize information into subjects in order to teach
children, furthermore there is a set curriculum that teachers follow and
students must learn. Students have no
control over their education and are tested to ensure they have learned the
predetermined information. Also schools
teach subject matter in a deductive and inductive manner. For me the philosophy
that I would like to see more in schools is existentialism, however due to standardized
testing I think this philosophy is least prevalent. With the philosophy of existentialism it is
hard to measure with tests also teachers today have specific curricula they
must adhere to which doesn’t allow for the students to take responsibility for
their own education. While I do understand
that it is important for students to learn certain basic things, I found myself
agreeing with this philosophy. We all
only have one life, shouldn’t we decide what we want to do and learn. I believe in each individual’s right to be
whomever they choose and unfortunately I believe our society really inhibits
certain aspects of who we are as an individual.
With existentialism I believe students may be able to better pursue who
they are and what they want to do; by allowing students to decide what to learn
they would be able to develop the content knowledge and skills required to work
in the area that interests them the most. If schools did follow this philosophy
more it would create a more student-centered approach. Also I think students will enjoy school more
when learning about things they are interested in and therefore will actually
get more out of their education than if they were force fed a bunch of
knowledge they have little interest in.
I think the theory most prevalent
in schools today is essentialism which ties very nicely into the philosophy of
realism. Students are required to
acquire a set level of skills in all subject matter and cultivate this
knowledge and skills in order to be competitive citizens. Essentialists are the reason that academic
standards for students have risen and students are now required to obtain
content knowledge at a set level in which is measured by standardized
tests. They use these tests to assess
how much students are learning as well as how well teachers are doing their
jobs. I don’t think these tests
accurately portray students’ knowledge or teacher’s capabilities as each state
has different tests and requirements making it very hard to compare
results. All of this contributes to the
inefficient education system as it currently stands. The theory I would like to see used more in
schools is progressivism as it accentuates the philosophy of
existentialism. With this theory
students can learn more in their areas of interest rather than being required
to learn about subject matter that doesn’t interest them at all. Also this theory uses a more hands on
approach in learning that focuses on completing projects, peer discussions and
other activities all of which foster a differentiated instructional approach to
the student-centered curricula. With the
student-centered curricula, differentiated instructional approach,
existentialism philosophy, and progressivism theory combined, I think students
will actually be more competitive in the global economy. Students will develop skills and knowledge
that interests them and learn how to apply this knowledge and skills in the
outside world. This will create
self-sufficient individuals with the ability to adapt to the ever changing
world. When we tell students what to do,
learn, as well as what is important, we remove from them the ability to make
decisions for them self. Without the
ability to make conscious decisions we fail to prepare them for a changing
world and we set them up for failure.
Resources:
Ornstein, A., Levine, D., & Gutek, G. (2011). Foundations of education. (11 ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.